Things that i would change in my curriculum 

Hi, in ths blog i need talk about the change that could be made to my curriculum. Well if i thinnking I dont have any problem with it, and, to my, not need any type of change. why? well, I concidered that the way that is conformed is well. In the firsts years the subject are more generals, for plant the base with the basic knowledges of the sciences, like chemistry, math, or physical. Apart, out of this type of subject, in the first years are possible found courses very important, that are proper of the career, that show how, and what role a pharmaceutical chemist plays in society. In coming years , the subject are more specific and are more relacionated with the carrear, oviously, are more, more! dificult, but, in them is posibe learn all the neceasry to be a good profesionals.
 about the workload and the lenght os the studies i don't have any complaint , is hard its true, but well, is a profession that need the best of the best, as a careless can produce a serious problem to much people, so needs highly prepared profesionals.

I don't like the infrastructure of the faculty, I really see it like a huge parking with few green areas. The worst, to me, is the entrance by "santos  dumont" dont have any tree! only have lights and pieces of wood in the form of ornament, is very ugly and borred . Other things are the laboratories, look very old, and various of the intrument too. I feel that the university should worry abouth this things.
In tecnology are well, if you go to computer labs, the internet and  computers work very well. But, in other labs, for example in the labs of biology, is other history, always a student have a problem with one of the microscope...Again, I feel that the university should do somethings to solve it.

It's true that are a lots of  teachers that his teaching methods are very good, but there are others that produce me a real anger, it's almost like they don't have any interest in that the student learn, and really thinks that they are gods. It´s true, they are expert in the matter that they teach, but to be a good teache not only is necesary know much, also is necesary know how to transmit his knowledges.